<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Of Relevance &#187; QVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ofrelevance.com/tag/qvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ofrelevance.com</link>
	<description>Eve Dmochowska's random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QVC has flawed logic&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://ofrelevance.com/2008/12/01/qvc-has-flawed-logic/</link>
		<comments>http://ofrelevance.com/2008/12/01/qvc-has-flawed-logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eve Dmochowska</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny or Peculiar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gripes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ofrelevance.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;among other problems. QVC has sued a blogger, Donn Edwards for posting what it considers to be defamatory posts around the ethics of their business practice. In short, QVC lures people to presentations with the promise of a prize (car, holiday, whatever). When you go to pick up your prize, you have to sit through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;among other problems.</p>
<p><a href="http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2008/11/blogger-freedoms-at-stake-here.html">QVC has sued a blogge</a>r, Donn Edwards for posting what it considers to be defamatory posts around the ethics of their business practice. In short, QVC lures people to presentations with the promise of a prize (car, holiday, whatever). When you go to pick up your prize, you have to sit through a presentation, and are then sold some sort of timeshare.</p>
<p>It’s scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to ethics, and it sucks.</p>
<p>QVC is suing for over <a href="http://www.openaccess.co.za/docs/QVC%203%20-%20Summons.zip">R450,000</a> because they claim that as a result of reading Edwards’ blog, the following happened:</p>
<ul>
<li>59 people refused to attend the presentation. Since QVC has a conversion rate of 15% at R6,000 (each) profit, this works out to a loss of R 54,000.00</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>15 members refused to pay their management fees, amounting to a further R52,500 loss.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, let’s see…..</p>
<p>One lonesome blog, that is mostly focused on writing about computer security, and whose audience is probably least likely to be talked into a QVC sale anyway, has cost QVC <strong>R106,000 pure profit.</strong></p>
<p>So what do they do? They go and sue the blogger. And what do the rest of us do? We write and comment about it. More blogs write. <a href="http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/search/label/Timeshare">Newspapers pick up the story</a>. It gets bigger…and bigger…and BIGGER.</p>
<p>Oops.</p>
<p>Also, keep in mind that the QVC loss came despite the fact that Edwards <strong>removed</strong> his posts. How will these losses escalate for posts that are not removed? And are indexed by Google? For ever. And, umm, &#8230;.ever.</p>
<p>It’s actually kind of funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ofrelevance.com/2008/12/01/qvc-has-flawed-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

